STATEMENT BY THE PARTNERSHIP FOR CHANGE ON THE LETTER FROM KENYAN PRESIDENT MWAI KIBAKI TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BARACK OBAMA issued at Nairobi 28th September 2009.
Sep 28th, 2009 by Mars Group Kenya
STATEMENT BY THE PARTNERSHIP FOR CHANGE ON THE LETTER FROM KENYAN PRESIDENT MWAI KIBAKI TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BARACK OBAMA issued at Nairobi 28th September 2009.
The Kibaki administration is ruffled by the United States Government latest actions on Kenya and it has nothing to do with travel bans. Money is at stake and the soft underbelly of the regime is exposed. Although it touts itself as financially self-reliant, in truth the Grand Coalition Government of Mwai Kibaki and Raila Odinga cannot afford to ignore the International Community and especially the United States’ stated intention of scrutinising all loans and financial programmes for Kenya by the International Financial Institutions. Things are now very serious for the two Kenyan leaders. There is an Aid Freeze in the making. Kibaki and Odinga should ask Daniel Arap Moi to tell them what the US Government Statement actually means.
The Grand Coalition Government has been castigated by the international community and even been the subject of international investigations following the National Accord – but each time it has arrogantly shrugged off its international critics with assertions of sovereignty. But this time Kibaki is worried and we can hazard a guess as to why this is the case. His financially strapped Government is facing the prospect of having all its “vision 2030 projects” rejected by the World Bank on the say so of the President of the United States of America. The Minister for Finance doubts publicly that he can meet payroll if things continue as they are going.
October is almost here and the Government has failed to pass the Appropriations Bill through Parliament and therefore has no authority to implement its budget in full. Even though earlier this year the Government got 200 million US $ from the International Monetary Fund for balance of payment support the Government remains cash strapped for its operations and has been hoping to convince international donors to pick up the tab for several important national programmes including the resettlement of IDPs, public infrastructure development, food relief and general humanitarian aid, and recently evacuation of the water towers of Kenya. This is unlikely to be forthcoming in the current environment of a US led financial squeeze because of bad governance.
As things stand today, both Parliament and the World Bank have ordered audits into Government finances including a forensic Audit into the National budget for the past 3 years.
The Statement by the United States Government regarding consideration of future International Financial Institution projects for Kenya is most welcome to the fundamental change constituency which wishes to see the back of the Grand Coalition Government.
Kenya has not seen such a statement since the Moi era in the 1990s. What this means for the Kenya Government is that there are serious considerations for an Aid freeze to Kenya and it is pegged to the implementation of the National Accord. It is good news to those Kenyans who support fundamental reform and devastating to those who are on the wrong side of history.
The news is encouraging, because it means that the Kenya Government cannot as it has always done in the recent past ignore the demands of Kenyans for reform and implementation of the National Accord without consequences. The picture emerging is that the Kenyan public have friends and powerful friends to boot and now the Grand Coalition Government could be facing a serious reality check. You can thumb your nose at public opinion about your economic management of public resources, but there are responsible Governments in the International Community who will have none of it.
The Statement released by President Obama’s Government states “ The United States will more closely scrutinise all proposed projects, loans and other programmes of assistance to Kenya that are brought before International Financial Institutions.” This means that the United States is planning to use its immense influence over the Boards of the Bretton Woods Institutions (World Bank and International Monetary Fund) to assert its Policy towards Kenya.
Regardless of what the Government’s apologists say, a reading of public opinion as expressed in the media, shows that US policy is in tandem with what the Kenyan public wants. Between Kenyan public opinion and the US Government position there are clear points of convergence. Thus the US statement is clear “ The United States will continue to support the Insistence of the Kenyan People that Fundamental reforms be fully implemented as agreed in the National Accord of 2008”
The United States is certainly not acting alone. It acts with the support and gratitude of Kenyan Public. The latter is confirmed by public opinion polling by the Kenyan media. The sign of the times, if now seen for what it is should shock the Government into immediate action. The Kenyan Government as sovereign as it may claim to be, cannot do without Bretton Woods Support and the Kenyan public will refuse to be committed to pay private commercial loans to support a Government that is not accountable to its people. Indeed, we have already refused to pay for a wasteful bloated Government. What we want to pay for is Fundamental Reforms under Agenda 4. The Government has not provided resources for these reforms in the largest budget in Kenya’s history.
On March 30th, 2009, the Partnership for Change wrote to Mr. Dominique Strauss-Kahn the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund asking the International Monetary Fund Board of Directors to consider the opinion of those Kenyans who will inevitably be taxed to repay whatever loan the Government of Kenya obtains regardless of whether or not Kenyans obtained any developmental benefit from it.
This Letter was followed by another dated June 2nd 2009, with subject title -Re: IMF’s odious loans are impoverishing Kenya through collusion with corrupt agents.
The Partnership for Change called for the Bretton Woods International Financial Institutions (especially the IMF and the World Bank) to immediately do an inventory of loans lost to corruption and public sector financial impropriety in Kenya. An independent panel of experts would determine, on a case by case basis, where responsibility lies. If it was found that their staff knowingly lent money to the Kenya Government who then siphoned it off through corruption, thereby contravening the institutions’ fiduciary mandate, negotiations about sharing liability should commence immediately. Kenya simply cannot afford more of the IMF’s unaccountable loan “medicine”. We as Kenyans were demanding the freedom to follow economic policies that protect the country from more harm.
Both letters were copied to the all multi – lateral and Bi – lateral donors to Kenya. The World Bank has already moved into action, suspending two current large projects in the last two days. Institutional Infrastructure Bond holders are now demanding to be told what projects their money is financing and the Government is being vague. When Parliament reconvenes the stalled forensic audit of the National Budget over the last 3 years will be the next urgent issue to be dealt with. And other donors apart from the United States are also enquiring into their Kenyan portfolios worried that they are being raided.
What Kibaki and Odinga should do once they next meet is face the reality that they are indeed big fish in a very small pond. And that they must take decisive steps to respond to Kenyans and International Community concerns about the stalled National Accord reform processes, and the economic well-being of the Nation. They will have to eventually make political sacrifices including dropping cabinet ministers (e.g. the Attorney General), and other senior government officials (e.g. the Chief Justice and Aaron Ringera). This is what Moi did when he faced similar actions. He sacked and arrested ministers and allowed multi-partyism by constitutional amendment. Both Kibaki and Odinga benefited from Moi’s decision, and Kenya’s democracy advanced. In reality reforms are not optional – they will come – sometimes painfully.
Mwai Kibaki has made his move, writing to Barrack Obama to complain. Kibaki has not made his letter public. Why? Instead Kibaki has continued to ignore the public and the only mandate he has, which is to deliver the reforms. Kibaki forgets or does not care that he has no electoral mandate and the reforms he is being asked to implement are critical for the survival of millions of Kenyans. Former advisors are openly calling his actions escapist.
Raila Odinga on the other hand seems delighted at Kibaki’s misfortunes falsely believing that it will assist his presidential ambitions. What Odinga forgets is that Kenyans now want fundamental Change and that the ODM is just status quo as the PNU. Odinga pretends he is not part of the problem, and yet as Prime Minister he is responsible for supervision and coordination of all Ministers. Kenyans will see him as a cynic as he tries to prepare to run without a record. Power without responsiblity.
And so to the final point. Kenyans urgently need to prepare for a democratic election. We have come to the point of diminishing returns. The more we have of the Grand Coalition Government the more Kenyans continue to suffer. Is it logical then, to keep asking those who are not prepared to deliver reforms to do so? So disadvantaged are Kenyans by this unelected Grand Coalition Government that we do not even have a voters register. We urgently need the Kriegler electoral reforms to be entrenched. Otherwise the next elections will be as farcical as the August 2009 by-elections in Shinyalu and Bomachoge where a toothless IIEC allowed ODM and PNU tn do a battle of bribery. We need the reforms to entrench a truly independent electoral referee who shall be able to control the excesses of Kibaki’s and Odinga’s political machinery. A democratic dispensation achieved through the ballot is our democratic right. Especially because the Grand Coalition is not based on an elected mandate, and rules only because Kenyans consented to a negotiated agreement to save the country from collapse. It is this agreement – the National Accord – and its reform package as set out in Agendas 1-4 that both Mwai Kibaki and Raila Odinga are not honouring.
We support the International Community in reigning in our rogue, insensitive, uncaring and visionless leaders. Keep up the pressure, Kenyans are totally with you. We have simply had enough.
Signed
Mars Group Kenya
For the Partnership for Change
Nairobi 28th September 2009.









Kenya shilling in sharpest daily drop since May
By Duncan Miriri
NAIROBI (Reuters) – Kenya’s shilling was on course for its biggest daily drop against the dollar since May on Monday, dragged down by short-covering, a political spat between Nairobi and Washington and a resurgent greenback.
At 0906 GMT, commercial banks posted the unit at 75.80/90 against the dollar, compared with Friday’s close of 74.85/95. By 1000 GMT it had recovered some ground to 75.60/70.
The shilling broke two resistance levels versus the dollar on September 17 to touch a fresh year high, driven by growing appetite among foreign investors for Kenya’s government and corporate debt.
Monday’s fall was the steepest since May 14, when the unit slid by 1.65 shillings from 76.80-78.45, Reuters data showed.
“This market has been sitting short (on dollars). People had taken the view the shilling was strengthening,” said Kennedy Butiko, deputy treasurer at Bank of Africa.
“One of the banks decided to come out of their short position and that triggered some short-covering by banks …It is also end-month, so some client orders were being closed.”
Other traders said the shilling was also reacting to events elsewhere in the world.
“The market might be reacting to some of the global trends where we are seeing a strengthening dollar,” said Noah Meely, a senior trader at Citi Bank. The U.S. dollar rose against the pound sterling last week.
Other traders, however, blamed the fall on negative sentiment after a increasingly bitter row between the government and Washington over delays to wide-ranging reforms.
“There seems to be a steep correction. There should be worries over this thing between Kenya and the U.S.,” said Peter Njuguna, head of trading at Commercial Bank of Africa.
Washington’s ambassador to Nairobi said last week that his government had sent warning letters to 15 prominent Kenyans, including sitting government ministers, who the United States accuse of blocking reform in east Africa’s biggest economy.
Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki sent back a protest note to U.S. President Barack Obama over the weekend, expressing his “displeasure and concern” about the letters.
Bank of Africa’s Butiko said there were concerns that the spat, coupled with graft allegations against officials working for donor projects and state firms, could affect the monetary support Kenya receives from its development partners.
The front page of one Kenyan daily newspaper was filled on Monday with fresh claims of corruption at the scandal-hit Kenya Pipeline Company and in the country’s schools.
Last week, Kenya’s government said it had uncovered fraud in two World Bank-funded projects in the education sector.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Dale Thele, CFB. Dale Thele, CFB said: STATEMENT BY THE PARTNERSHIP FOR CHANGE ON THE LETTER FROM KENYAN …: The Kenyan Government as sovereign as it.. http://bit.ly/2iwC6b [...]
Kibaki should catalyse reforms instead of protesting USA travel Ban
The two conflicting views on travel ban coming from the President and the Prime Minister who are partners in the grand coalition government shows that one faction is for reforms and another ardent protectors of the status quo.
The two leaders must take full responsibility for failing to provide direction in the reform process instead of duelling on empty rhetoric.
If the Prime Minister is for reforms, he should avoid portraying himself as Mr. clean, when he is part and parcel of the grand coalition government. He should instead tell Kenyans and world what he has done individually to catapult reforms in the Country. His recent speech in Harvard University, where he supported the USA’s travel ban on government officials convinced the world that it’s the government that is behind the delay to bring about reforms in Kenya. It also showed a fatigued reform process and a disoriented government that lacks operational uniformity.
President Kibaki should also tell us why the government has failed to implement the reforms Kenyans desperately need to pave the way for smooth running of the country’s social, economic and political affairs. The protest letter to Washington portrays Kibaki as a leader hell-bent on protecting few individuals and not the interests of the masses; the bulky of those who have been voting for him to public office for many decades. We want him to focus on the wellbeing of the Kenyan people and their future but not the interests of power barons. It would have made sense if the President stated in the protest letter, the reasons for procrastinating reforms instead of just criticizing Washington’s travel ban on government officials.
Kenyans will support any external pressure if it will compel the government to implement the reforms the nation desperately need. In fact, the USA has made a positive step and it will be fair if other Western powers especially the EU took similar steps.
The president his Vice, the Prime Minister and his deputies all should suffer the travel ban because its them who are in the seats of power but are impediments to the reform process. Our leaders likes being pushed from outside in order to implement reforms. It’s the pressure from outside that compelled former President Moi to accept the reintroduction of multiparty democracy in the early 1991. Kenyans remember the activities of former ambassadors of Germany, Berndth Muzelberg and the late Smith Hemsptone of the United States in the reform process in Kenya.
Indeed, Kibaki and Raila were pushed externally to agree on power sharing as a result of former US Secretary of State; Condy Rice’s terse statement in Nairobi last year. It’s sad that after one and a half years of the grand coalition government, the nation is still at limbo on meaningful reforms especially Agenda Four of the National Accord.
We are shocked on the president’s swift response on Washington’s ban on government officials when he his known to be silent on issues that require urgent response especially those that affect the lives of millions of Kenyans. He has kept silent on the Ringera circus as well as the trial of the Masterminds of post election violence and now wants to defend a few individuals in the grand coalition government who are likely to be persona non grata in the USA?
Finally, it’s imperative that Raila Odinga and Mwai Kibaki play pivotal roles to catalyse reforms in Kenya failure to which, we shall conclude that they are the biggest impediments to realize this end.
Joseph Lister Nyaringo,
USA, Georgia
hello sir i really like your blog many knowledgeable information in this blog and every articles in this blog really very nice thanks for share it.
====
Girish
====
Debt management plan–Debt management plan